H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Michelle Tyler vs Beverly Mould H2H: 0-1

Beverly Mould holds a 1–0 lead over Michelle Tyler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beverly Mould leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Beverly Mould won the 1982 Beckenham round of 32 7-5 6-3.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 64 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Beverly Mould 7-5 6-3 Michelle Tyler Match data Jun 4, 1982* R32 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michelle Tyler 1,888 93 80 53.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Beverly Mould #46 #46 1,666 32 46 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michelle Tyler Beverly Mould
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0
14 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,468 0 0
16 1975 23–16 59.0% 1,686 0 0
17 1976 27–13 67.5% 1,757 0 4
18 1977 13–10 56.5% 1,799 0 4 1980 1–1 50.0% 1,504 0 0
19 1978 20–23 46.5% 1,774 0 4 1981 7–7 50.0% 1,520 0 0
20 1979 5–10 33.3% 1,662 0 4 1982 6–6 50.0% 1,574 0 0
21 1980 1–3 25.0% 1,602 0 4 1983 5–6 45.5% 1,599 0 0
22 1984 10–14 41.7% #46 1,647 0 0
23 1982 4–2 66.7% 1,612 0 5 1985 3–12 20.0% 1,536 0 0
24 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,593 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michelle Tyler Beverly Mould
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1975 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2%
17 1976 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 4 16 75.0%
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1978 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1979 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1982 3 0 3 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 6 9 15 40.0% 38 24 62 61.3% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 17 34 50.0% 10 17 27 37.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michelle Tyler Beverly Mould
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1972 1486 93.5 0.0% -5.00 +0.04
14 1973 1469 97.2 0.0% -3.00 +0.11
16 1975 1686 127.6 -56 -16 57.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +2.25
17 1976 1757 133.2 -3 +2 -109 65.1% +1.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +8.09
18 1977 1799 134.0 -51 -1 -92 56.3% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 -0.52 1980 1505 99.2 50.0% -0.25 +0.23
19 1978 1775 140.5 -92 +41 +17 46.7% -0.39 7–5 (58%) 3–1 (75%) 105.1 -4.07 1981 1521 115.2 53.3% +0.83 0–2 0–6 (0%) +1.08
20 1979 1662 101.5 +122 +53 31.3% -1.75 2–0 2–1 (67%) +0.91 1982 1575 120.3 +20 +30 55.2% -0.04 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) +0.29
21 1980 1602 96.1 +123 25.0% -1.25 1–1 +0.54 1983 1600 117.3 +18 +52 47.8% -0.30 0–1 1–0 +0.31
22 1984 1647 123.3 -41 -1 41.8% -0.45 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 +0.37
23 1982 1613 102.2 +161 61.5% +0.54 1–0 +1.08 1985 1537 101.2 -37 +81 25.7% -1.51 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 +0.96
24 1983 1593 97.8 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 +0.19
Career 1888 132.1 -56 +13 -21 52.9% +0.25 24–18 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 105.9 +5.04 1667 120.3 -28 +34 +25 43.8% -0.35 7–13 (35%) 9–12 (43%) 94.1 +4.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.