H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Michelle Tyler vs Jo Durie H2H: 1-0

Michelle Tyler holds a 1–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Tyler leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michelle Tyler won the 1977 Beckenham semifinal 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michelle Tyler
GBR Age 68
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michelle Tyler 7-5 7-5 Jo Durie Match data Jun 3, 1977* SF Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michelle Tyler — — — 1,888 93 80 53.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michelle Tyler Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,468 0 0 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,686 0 0 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0
17 1976 27–13 67.5% — 1,757 0 4 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,619 0 1
18 1977 13–10 56.5% — 1,799 0 4 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1978 20–23 46.5% — 1,774 0 4 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,733 0 4
20 1979 5–10 33.3% — 1,662 0 4 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,859 0 7
21 1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,602 0 4 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 — — — — — — — 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9
23 1982 4–2 66.7% — 1,612 0 5 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9
24 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,593 0 5 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9
25 — — — — — — — 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9
26 — — — — — — — 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 — — — — — — — 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michelle Tyler Jo Durie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
16 1975 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 1976 — — — — 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1978 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1979 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1980 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1982 — — — — 3 0 3 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1983 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 6 9 15 40.0% 38 24 62 61.3% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 17 34 50.0% — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michelle Tyler Jo Durie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1972 1486 93.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1973 1469 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.14
16 1975 1686 127.6 — — — — — -56 -16 57.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +2.25 1977 1602 121.5 — — — — — -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.47
17 1976 1757 133.2 — — — — -3 +2 -109 65.1% +1.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +8.09 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +18 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99
18 1977 1799 134.0 — — — — -51 -1 -92 56.3% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.52 1979 1714 129.5 — — — — — -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87
19 1978 1775 140.5 — — — — -92 +41 +17 46.7% -0.39 7–5 (58%) 3–1 (75%) 105.1 -4.07 1980 1734 122.7 — — — — -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68
20 1979 1662 101.5 — — — — — +122 +53 31.3% -1.75 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.91 1981 1859 136.3 — — — — -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98
21 1980 1602 96.1 — — — — — +123 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–1 — +0.54 1982 1841 141.1 — — — — -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2095 159.8 — — — — -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64
23 1982 1613 102.2 — — — — — +161 — 61.5% +0.54 1–0 — — +1.08 1984 1891 136.3 — — — — +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18
24 1983 1593 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.19 1985 1800 133.3 — — — — +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1842 140.0 — — — — +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1741 134.1 — — — — +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1622 126.0 — — — — -8 — +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1689 130.7 — — — — -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1563 107.8 — — — — -11 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1548 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
Career — 1888 132.1 — — — — -56 +13 -21 52.9% +0.25 24–18 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 105.9 +5.04 — 2101 141.6 — — — — -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.