H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Michelle Tyler vs Kate Brasher H2H: 1-0

Michelle Tyler holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Brasher in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Tyler leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michelle Tyler won the 1982 Southport England final 3-6 6-4 6-2.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michelle Tyler 3-6 6-4 6-2 Kate Brasher Match data Apr 14, 1982* F Southport England WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michelle Tyler — — — 1,889 93 80 53.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Kate Brasher — — — 1,734 73 61 54.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michelle Tyler Kate Brasher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,468 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,465 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,686 0 0 1979 0–4 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
17 1976 27–13 67.5% — 1,757 0 4 1980 8–11 42.1% — 1,480 0 0
18 1977 13–10 56.5% — 1,799 0 4 1981 29–16 64.4% — 1,622 0 2
19 1978 20–23 46.5% — 1,776 0 4 1982 25–11 69.4% — 1,638 0 4
20 1979 5–10 33.3% — 1,663 0 4 1983 3–5 37.5% — 1,612 0 6
21 1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,603 0 4 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,584 0 6
22 — — — — — — — 1985 0–3 0.0% — 1,531 0 6
23 1982 4–2 66.7% — 1,613 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,593 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michelle Tyler Kate Brasher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1975 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1976 — — — — 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1980 — — — — 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1978 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1979 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 1980 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1982 — — — — 3 0 3 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 6 9 15 40.0% 38 24 62 61.3% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 17 34 50.0% — 2 4 6 33.3% 17 18 35 48.6% 5 17 22 22.7% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michelle Tyler Kate Brasher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1972 1486 93.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.04 1976 1481 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.46
14 1973 1469 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 1977 1466 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1493 109.5 — — — — — — +18 50.0% +0.37 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.67
16 1975 1686 127.6 — — — — — -55 -16 57.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +1.99 1979 1440 92.3 — — — — — +18 — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.64
17 1976 1757 133.3 — — — — -3 +2 -108 65.1% +1.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +7.82 1980 1481 106.8 — — — — — -8 +24 42.2% -0.47 4–3 (57%) — — +0.59
18 1977 1800 134.0 — — — — -52 -2 -93 56.3% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.65 1981 1622 128.1 — — — — — — -125 63.4% +0.97 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 +0.47
19 1978 1776 140.8 — — — — -93 +40 +16 46.7% -0.39 7–5 (58%) 3–1 (75%) 105.2 -4.48 1982 1639 118.1 — — — — -125 -5 -131 64.1% +1.04 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +2.59
20 1979 1664 101.6 — — — — — +121 +51 31.3% -1.75 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.80 1983 1612 104.4 — — — — — — -133 35.0% -1.20 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 +0.31
21 1980 1603 96.1 — — — — — +123 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–1 — +0.50 1984 1585 95.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.43 1–0 — — +0.62
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1531 92.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.31
23 1982 1614 102.2 — — — — — +161 — 61.5% +0.54 1–0 — — +1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 1594 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1889 132.2 — — — — -57 +13 -22 52.9% +0.25 24–18 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 105.9 +4.30 — 1735 116.9 — — — — -125 -4 -77 52.8% +0.29 17–13 (57%) 9–11 (45%) 102.6 +5.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.