H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Michelle Tyler vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-0

Michelle Tyler holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michelle Tyler leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michelle Tyler won the 1978 Eastbourne Open round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michelle Tyler
GBR Age 68
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michelle Tyler 3-6 6-4 6-4 Kate Latham Match data Jun 22, 1978* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michelle Tyler — — — 1,888 93 80 53.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michelle Tyler Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,686 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1976 27–13 67.5% — 1,757 0 4 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1977 13–10 56.5% — 1,799 0 4 — — — — — — —
19 1978 20–23 46.5% — 1,774 0 4 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1979 5–10 33.3% — 1,662 0 4 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,602 0 4 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1982 4–2 66.7% — 1,612 0 5 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,593 0 5 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michelle Tyler Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 — — — — 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1979 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1980 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1982 — — — — 3 0 3 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1983 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 6 9 15 40.0% 38 24 62 61.3% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 17 34 50.0% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michelle Tyler Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1972 1486 93.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1973 1469 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1686 127.6 — — — — — -56 -16 57.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +2.25 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1976 1757 133.2 — — — — -3 +2 -109 65.1% +1.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +8.09 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1977 1799 134.0 — — — — -51 -1 -92 56.3% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 1775 140.5 — — — — -92 +41 +17 46.7% -0.39 7–5 (58%) 3–1 (75%) 105.1 -4.07 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1979 1662 101.5 — — — — — +122 +53 31.3% -1.75 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.91 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1980 1602 96.1 — — — — — +123 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–1 — +0.54 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1982 1613 102.2 — — — — — +161 — 61.5% +0.54 1–0 — — +1.08 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1983 1593 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.19 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1888 132.1 — — — — -56 +13 -21 52.9% +0.25 24–18 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 105.9 +5.04 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.