H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Michelle Tyler vs Katja Ebbinghaus H2H: 1-1

Michelle Tyler and Katja Ebbinghaus are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michelle Tyler leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katja Ebbinghaus won the 1979 Nice round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michelle Tyler
GBR Age 68
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Katja Ebbinghaus
FRG Age 78

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Katja Ebbinghaus 6-1 6-1 Michelle Tyler Match data Apr 1, 1979* R32 Nice WTA 250 —
Michelle Tyler 3-6 6-3 6-2 Katja Ebbinghaus Match data May 27, 1978* QF Italian Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michelle Tyler — — — 1,889 93 80 53.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Katja Ebbinghaus — — — 1,878 179 146 55.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michelle Tyler Katja Ebbinghaus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,686 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 27–13 67.5% — 1,757 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1977 13–10 56.5% — 1,799 0 4 — — — — — — —
19 1978 20–23 46.5% — 1,776 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1979 5–10 33.3% — 1,663 0 4 1968 4–6 40.0% — 1,493 0 0
21 1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,603 0 4 1969 10–9 52.6% — 1,559 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1970 4–5 44.4% — 1,577 0 0
23 1982 4–2 66.7% — 1,613 0 5 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,592 0 0
24 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,593 0 5 1972 24–12 66.7% — 1,832 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,814 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 1974 19–17 52.8% — 1,779 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1975 19–14 57.6% — 1,838 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1976 10–9 52.6% — 1,765 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1977 26–14 65.0% — 1,820 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1978 6–16 27.3% — 1,690 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1979 3–4 42.9% — 1,653 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,710 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1981 3–5 37.5% — 1,672 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 1982 3–1 75.0% — 1,679 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michelle Tyler Katja Ebbinghaus
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 — — — — 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1968 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1980 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1982 — — — — 3 0 3 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1971 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 1983 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1972 2 1 3 66.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 0 3 3 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 0 3 100.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 6 9 15 40.0% 38 24 62 61.3% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 17 34 50.0% — 4 11 15 26.7% 132 88 220 60.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 15 17 32 46.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michelle Tyler Katja Ebbinghaus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1972 1486 93.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1973 1469 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1686 127.6 — — — — — -55 -16 57.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1757 133.3 — — — — -3 +2 -108 65.1% +1.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +7.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1800 134.0 — — — — -52 -2 -93 56.3% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1978 1776 140.8 — — — — -93 +40 +16 46.7% -0.39 7–5 (58%) 3–1 (75%) 105.2 -4.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 1664 101.6 — — — — — +121 +51 31.3% -1.75 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.80 1968 1494 106.8 — — — — — -1 — 47.8% -0.30 0–3 (0%) — — -0.04
21 1980 1603 96.1 — — — — — +123 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–1 — +0.50 1969 1559 120.0 — — — — +58 -14 — 53.5% +0.37 2–3 (40%) — — +0.60
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1577 112.4 — — — — — +12 — 42.9% -0.48 2–1 (67%) — — +0.41
23 1982 1614 102.2 — — — — — +161 — 61.5% +0.54 1–0 — — +1.03 1971 1593 120.8 — — — — — -4 -15 54.3% +0.37 1–7 (13%) — — +1.77
24 1983 1594 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.19 1972 1832 145.6 — — — — -229 +82 -272 65.5% +0.91 5–7 (42%) 0–2 — -2.08
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1815 136.7 — — — — -146 +69 — 54.9% +0.10 4–7 (36%) 2–0 — -2.45
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1780 126.8 — — — — -223 +72 -178 56.0% +0.31 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 99.3 -0.92
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1839 139.4 — — — — — +59 — 56.0% +0.24 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 103.7 -1.56
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1765 129.1 — — — — — +93 -151 51.2% +0.30 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.11
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1820 138.1 — — — — -237 +105 -211 60.2% +0.77 9–4 (69%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 +0.73
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1691 126.6 — — — — -134 +162 -113 33.3% -1.17 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.8 -1.89
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1653 108.5 — — — — -65 — — 43.8% -0.63 1–1 1–0 — +1.21
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1710 128.6 — — — — — +78 — 62.3% +1.20 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +1.31
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1672 108.9 — — — — — +133 — 53.8% +0.69 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +1.11
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1680 106.2 — — — — — +115 — 75.0% +1.50 — — — +0.60
Career — 1889 132.2 — — — — -57 +13 -22 52.9% +0.25 24–18 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 105.9 +4.30 — 1879 138.4 — — — — -150 +67 -146 55.2% +0.35 47–53 (47%) 20–20 (50%) 97.1 -0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.