H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Michelle Tyler vs Katja Ebbinghaus H2H: 1-1
Michelle Tyler and Katja Ebbinghaus are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michelle Tyler leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katja Ebbinghaus won the 1979 Nice third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1979* | Nice | WTA 250 | R32 | — | Katja Ebbinghaus | 6-1 6-1 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
| May 27, 1978* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Michelle Tyler | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Katja Ebbinghaus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Katja Ebbinghaus | — | — | — | 1,873 | 173 | 143 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Tyler | Katja Ebbinghaus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 6 |