H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Michelle Tyler vs Linda Geeves H2H: 0-2
Linda Geeves holds a 2–0 lead over Michelle Tyler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Linda Geeves leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Geeves won the 1980 Stourbridge third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1980* | Stourbridge | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Linda Geeves | 7-5 7-5 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1980* | Hampstead | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Linda Geeves | 7-6 6-1 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Linda Geeves | — | — | — | 1,613 | 44 | 61 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Tyler | Linda Geeves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |