H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Michelle Tyler vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-1
Nancy Richey holds a 1–0 lead over Michelle Tyler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nancy Richey leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1977 Roland Garros second round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 68
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1977* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-0 6-3 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Tyler | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |