H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Michelle Tyler vs Terry Holladay H2H: 1-3
Terry Holladay holds a 3–1 lead over Michelle Tyler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Terry Holladay leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Terry Holladay won the 1979 Brighton third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 68
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 1979* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Terry Holladay | 6-1 6-1 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1978* | Hollywood | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Michelle Tyler | (w/o) | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1975* | Chichester | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Terry Holladay | 6-4 6-4 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
| May 17, 1975* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Terry Holladay | 8-6 6-2 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michelle Tyler | Terry Holladay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |