H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Micki Schillig vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 1-0

Micki Schillig holds a 1–0 lead over Kay Mcdaniel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Micki Schillig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Micki Schillig won the 1982 Oklahoma City round of 16 5-7 7-5 6-3.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Micki Schillig 5-7 7-5 6-3 Kay Mcdaniel Match data Jul 9, 1982* R16 Oklahoma City WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Micki Schillig — — — 1,650 26 30 46.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kay Mcdaniel — — — 1,653 18 41 30.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Micki Schillig Kay Mcdaniel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,515 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
20 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,519 0 0
21 1982 14–6 70.0% — 1,638 0 1 1979 10–12 45.5% — 1,625 0 0
22 1983 4–5 44.4% — 1,611 0 1 1980 2–13 13.3% — 1,547 0 0
23 1984 3–9 25.0% — 1,527 0 1 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,521 0 0
24 1985 5–6 45.5% — 1,520 0 1 1982 1–3 25.0% — 1,495 0 0
25 1986 0–3 0.0% — 1,474 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,479 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1986 0–3 0.0% — 1,449 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,443 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Micki Schillig Kay Mcdaniel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1983 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 11 15 26 42.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 7 13 20 35.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Micki Schillig Kay Mcdaniel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1516 99.4 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% -0.28 1–0 — — +0.34
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1498 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1486 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05
20 1981 1488 100.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.11 1978 1519 108.0 — — — — +99 — — 55.6% +0.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
21 1982 1639 122.2 — — — — -33 — — 64.4% +1.11 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.82 1979 1625 126.6 — — — — +20 — +26 43.4% -0.57 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 +0.40
22 1983 1611 103.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — +1.11 1980 1547 99.3 — — — — -28 — +43 22.9% -2.23 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -0.28
23 1984 1527 98.0 — — — — +39 +14 — 32.1% -1.46 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.15 1981 1522 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.07
24 1985 1520 95.3 — — — — — -19 — 40.0% -0.80 3–0 (100%) — — +0.79 1982 1496 104.3 — — — — +12 — — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 1–1 — +0.49
25 1986 1474 88.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1480 96.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — +0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1449 95.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1443 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — 0.00
Career — 1651 105.9 — — — — +9 0 — 44.4% -0.37 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.1 +7.71 — 1653 110.5 — — — — +12 +25 +31 34.8% -1.17 8–12 (40%) 8–4 (67%) 102.5 +2.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.