H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Miho Saeki vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 0-1
Barbara Paulus holds a 1–0 lead over Miho Saeki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Paulus leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1998 Key Biscayne second round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Barbara Paulus | 7-6 6-3 | Miho Saeki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miho Saeki | #884 | #56 | 461 | 1,579 | 26 | 57 | 31.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Paulus | #347 | #10 | 1,696 | 1,956 | 229 | 138 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miho Saeki | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #165 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #15 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #76 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #209 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1999 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #119 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #23 | 1,802 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #13 | 1,876 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #24 | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |