H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Miho Saeki vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 0-2
Kimberly Po Messerli holds a 2–0 lead over Miho Saeki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimberly Po Messerli leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1999 Tokyo third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1999* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kimberly Po Messerli | 7-5 6-2 | Miho Saeki | Match data |
| Sep 19, 1996* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-2 6-1 | Miho Saeki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miho Saeki | #884 | #56 | 461 | 1,579 | 26 | 57 | 31.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miho Saeki | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #76 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #119 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |