H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Miki Yokobori vs Maja Zivec Skulj H2H: 0-1

Maja Zivec Skulj holds a 1–0 lead over Miki Yokobori in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maja Zivec Skulj leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maja Zivec Skulj won the 1994 China Open round of 32 7-6 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miki Yokobori
JPN Age 51
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Maja Zivec Skulj
GER Age 52 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maja Zivec Skulj 7-6 2-6 6-4 Miki Yokobori Match data Feb 17, 1994* R32 China Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miki Yokobori — — — 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maja Zivec Skulj — — — 1,500 11 30 26.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miki Yokobori Maja Zivec Skulj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1991 0–3 0.0% — 1,448 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 1–6 14.3% — 1,422 0 0
19 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0 1993 5–12 29.4% — 1,451 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1994 3–5 37.5% — 1,465 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,464 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% — 1,468 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miki Yokobori Maja Zivec Skulj
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — 4 12 16 25.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miki Yokobori Maja Zivec Skulj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1485 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.13
17 1992 1492 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.03 1991 1449 96.2 — — — — +44 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.29
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1422 105.8 — — — — +34 +99 — 29.4% -1.41 0–3 (0%) — — +0.17
19 1994 1475 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 1993 1452 117.4 — — — — 0 +81 — 39.5% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.36
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1466 98.4 — — — — +5 — — 38.9% -1.56 1–1 2–0 — +0.12
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1465 98.5 — — — — -6 — — 28.6% -1.28 1–0 — — -0.09
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1469 103.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.24
Career — 1500 100.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.34 0–2 0–1 — +11.50 — 1500 107.7 — — — — +13 +85 — 35.1% -1.06 5–11 (31%) 3–2 (60%) 98.7 +2.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.