H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Andrea Leand H2H: 1-1

Mima Jausovec and Andrea Leand are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrea Leand leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Leand won the 1984 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 6-4 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Andrea Leand
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Leand #36 6-4 2-6 6-2 Mima Jausovec #57 Match data Oct 18, 1984* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Hard
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-1 Andrea Leand Match data Feb 13, 1982* QF Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Andrea Leand #857 #27 13 1,881 83 104 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Andrea Leand
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1981 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1982 29–22 56.9% — 1,812 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4 1983 17–18 48.6% — 1,784 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1984 19–18 51.4% #35 1,774 0 1
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1985 1–5 16.7% #33 1,681 0 1
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6 1986 0–3 0.0% #214 1,627 0 1
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6 — — — — — — —
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6 1988 0–1 0.0% #296 1,607 0 1
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7 1989 3–7 30.0% #152 1,579 0 1
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1990 6–15 28.6% #142 1,516 0 1
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1991 4–9 30.8% #180 1,504 0 1
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 — — — — — — —
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1993 0–2 0.0% #341 1,473 0 1
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1994 0–1 0.0% #461 1,472 0 1
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Andrea Leand
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 8 17 52.9%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1991 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 37 36 73 50.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 10 18 28 35.7% 20 30 50 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Andrea Leand
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1981 1564 118.3 — — — — +112 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.64
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1982 1813 151.1 — — — — +80 -158 -211 58.6% +0.34 6–10 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 102.1 -2.70
19 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1983 1785 132.5 — — — — +54 -45 -182 48.8% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.5 -1.64
20 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1984 1775 142.9 — — — — +39 -6 -186 53.3% +0.21 6–10 (38%) 2–5 (29%) 91.3 -0.75
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1985 1681 93.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.92 — — — +0.61
22 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1986 1628 92.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — +0.24
23 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1988 1608 97.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14
25 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1989 1579 123.9 — — — — +89 — — 34.8% -1.13 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 +0.47
26 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1990 1517 111.0 — — — — +34 — +59 29.2% -1.79 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.82
27 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 1991 1505 113.3 — — — — +4 — — 34.6% -1.46 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.52
28 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1993 1474 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.38
30 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33 1994 1472 108.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32
31 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 — 1882 138.5 — — — — +56 -85 -134 46.4% -0.44 29–34 (46%) 15–19 (44%) 98.3 -0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.