H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Ann Henricksson H2H: 1-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1984 US Open round of 64 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Ann Henricksson
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec #49 6-1 7-6 Ann Henricksson #92 Match data Aug 31, 1984* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Ann Henricksson — #36 21 1,756 147 210 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Ann Henricksson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1980 3–5 37.5% — 1,498 0 0
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1981 1–4 20.0% — 1,478 0 0
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6 1982 5–6 45.5% — 1,522 0 0
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6 1983 9–19 32.1% — 1,541 0 0
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6 1984 13–16 44.8% #40 1,659 0 0
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7 1985 18–22 45.0% — 1,698 0 0
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7 1986 20–21 48.8% #49 1,692 0 0
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7 1987 17–23 42.5% #60 1,653 0 0
28 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7 1988 15–19 44.1% #71 1,647 0 0
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1989 18–21 46.2% #53 1,676 0 0
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1990 11–19 36.7% #114 1,628 0 0
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1991 8–13 38.1% #142 1,596 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1992 0–6 0.0% #272 1,525 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1993 5–9 35.7% #141 1,542 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 1994 4–7 36.4% #215 1,530 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Ann Henricksson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1981 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1983 3 7 10 30.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1985 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 11 14 21.4% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1991 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 54 94 148 36.5% 9 20 29 31.0% 57 49 106 53.8% 27 47 74 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Ann Henricksson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46 1980 1498 103.8 — — — — — +4 +85 41.2% -1.35 0–1 — — +0.37
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09 1981 1478 107.0 — — — — — +42 — 27.3% -1.46 0–1 1–1 — +0.32
22 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01 1982 1523 115.0 — — — — +33 +1 — 38.1% -0.95 1–0 — — -0.11
23 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84 1983 1541 115.6 — — — — 0 -4 +71 33.8% -0.85 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.4 +1.04
24 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23 1984 1659 129.2 — — — — -144 -134 +106 46.9% -0.42 2–4 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 102.6 +0.25
25 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20 1985 1698 132.0 — — — — -126 — +89 47.9% -0.26 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 101.0 +1.45
26 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60 1986 1692 127.7 — — — — -40 -178 +86 48.3% -0.36 7–4 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 106.1 +1.06
27 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24 1987 1653 125.7 — — — — -14 -156 +67 41.5% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 2–9 (18%) 100.7 -0.11
28 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55 1988 1647 128.7 — — — — -57 — +101 45.5% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 99.8 +0.79
29 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21 1989 1677 133.4 — — — — -50 — +85 45.6% -0.20 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 99.5 +1.05
30 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39 1990 1628 118.3 — — — — -73 — +176 37.1% -1.06 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 103.2 -1.10
31 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 1991 1597 121.2 — — — — -37 — +179 39.6% -0.50 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +0.17
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1525 101.8 — — — — -19 — — 20.0% -2.33 0–3 (0%) — — -0.35
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1543 121.7 — — — — -2 — — 45.5% -0.18 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -0.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1531 101.6 — — — — -10 — — 30.4% -1.52 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.07
Career — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80 — 1756 130.2 — — — — -50 -57 +100 42.3% -0.52 56–55 (50%) 36–50 (42%) 101.3 +1.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.