H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Annabel Croft H2H: 2-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 2–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1985 Roland Garros round of 128 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-0 Annabel Croft Match data May 29, 1985* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-1 6-2 Annabel Croft Match data Jun 22, 1983* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6 — — — — — — —
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6 — — — — — — —
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6 — — — — — — —
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7 — — — — — — —
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 — — — — — — —
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 — — — — — — —
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 — — — — — — —
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Annabel Croft
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
19 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
20 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
22 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.