H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Beverly Mould H2H: 1-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 1–0 lead over Beverly Mould in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1982 Berlin Open round of 16 6-3 6-2.

SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 64 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-2 Beverly Mould Match data May 21, 1982* R16 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Beverly Mould #46 #46 1,666 32 46 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Beverly Mould
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% 1,533 0 1
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,560 0 1
17 1974 18–13 58.1% 1,793 0 1
18 1975 16–19 45.7% 1,833 0 1 1980 1–1 50.0% 1,504 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% 2,004 0 4 1981 7–7 50.0% 1,520 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% 2,010 1 5 1982 6–6 50.0% 1,574 0 0
21 1978 29–19 60.4% 1,947 1 6 1983 5–6 45.5% 1,599 0 0
22 1979 32–28 53.3% 1,870 1 6 1984 10–14 41.7% #46 1,647 0 0
23 1980 34–22 60.7% 1,945 1 6 1985 3–12 20.0% 1,536 0 0
24 1981 57–28 67.1% 2,013 1 6
25 1982 36–24 60.0% 1,857 1 7
26 1983 23–16 59.0% 1,873 1 7
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Beverly Mould
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 2 0 2 100.0%
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1980 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1985 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% 10 17 27 37.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Beverly Mould
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 100.0% +3.75 +0.55
16 1973 1561 114.8 +38 57.1% +1.57 1–0 +0.21
17 1974 1794 144.8 -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90
18 1975 1833 146.7 -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1980 1505 99.2 50.0% -0.25 +0.23
19 1976 2004 156.6 -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1981 1521 115.2 53.3% +0.83 0–2 0–6 (0%) +1.08
20 1977 2011 161.6 -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1982 1575 120.3 +20 +30 55.2% -0.04 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) +0.29
21 1978 1947 147.6 -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1983 1600 117.3 +18 +52 47.8% -0.30 0–1 1–0 +0.31
22 1979 1871 146.4 -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1984 1647 123.3 -41 -1 41.8% -0.45 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 +0.37
23 1980 1945 155.9 +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 1985 1537 101.2 -37 +81 25.7% -1.51 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 +0.96
24 1981 2013 157.1 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
25 1982 1858 148.5 +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
26 1983 1874 143.9 -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67
27 1984 1748 131.7 -27 +199 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31
28 1985 1695 127.6 -21 +205 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67
29 1986 1673 105.7 +197 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.18
30 1987 1656 107.2 +179 40.0% -1.60 0–2 -0.33
31 1988 1641 110.1 +162 25.0% -2.75 -0.77
Career 2091 156.0 -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 1667 120.3 -28 +34 +25 43.8% -0.35 7–13 (35%) 9–12 (43%) 94.1 +4.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.