H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mima Jausovec vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 1-0
Mima Jausovec holds a 1–0 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1984 Berlin third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1984* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 6-4 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mima Jausovec | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |