H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 1-3

Catherine Tanvier holds a 3–1 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Catherine Tanvier leads 2–0 on carpet, while Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1985 Delray Beach second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 69 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 7, 1985* Delray Beach WTA 1000 R64 Hard Catherine Tanvier #30 6-1 6-3 Mima Jausovec #82 Match data
Dec 13, 1984* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 R32 Carpet Catherine Tanvier #29 6-3 7-5 Mima Jausovec #85 Match data
Oct 21, 1983* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Catherine Tanvier 7-5 7-6 Mima Jausovec Match data
May 31, 1983* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-3 Catherine Tanvier Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,088 339 246 57.9% 1 1 0 1 4 7
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,877 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,790 0 1 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,791 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,804 0 1 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,824 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 1,996 0 4 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,008 1 5 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,922 1 6 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,825 0 0
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,866 1 6 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,941 1 6 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,602 0 0
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,010 1 6 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,861 1 7 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,658 0 0
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —