H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 4-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 4–0 lead over Florenta Mihai in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1979 Houston round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Florenta Mihai
ROU

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-4 Florenta Mihai Match data Jan 18, 1979* R32 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-1 Florenta Mihai Match data Jun 28, 1978* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-7 6-1 Florenta Mihai Match data Jun 5, 1977* F Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-1 6-2 Florenta Mihai Match data Feb 7, 1976* R16 Akron WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Florenta Mihai — — — 1,800 89 90 49.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Florenta Mihai
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1974 3–2 60.0% — 1,515 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,508 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,634 0 0
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1977 16–13 55.2% — 1,774 0 1
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6 1978 7–20 25.9% — 1,643 0 1
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6 1979 7–9 43.8% — 1,615 0 1
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6 1980 7–9 43.8% — 1,578 0 1
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7 1981 30–13 69.8% — 1,652 0 3
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,618 0 3
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,625 0 3
28 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7 — — — — — — —
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Florenta Mihai
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1974 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1976 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1979 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1980 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1981 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1982 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 3 10 13 23.1% 39 27 66 59.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 9 22 31 29.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Florenta Mihai
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20 1974 1516 105.0 — — — — — +18 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 0–1 — +1.27
19 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08 1975 1509 103.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 — +1.60
20 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46 1976 1634 124.6 — — — — -65 +1 -50 41.8% -0.45 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 107.6 +0.72
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09 1977 1775 133.5 — — — — -216 +53 — 52.9% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 106.6 +0.58
22 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01 1978 1643 119.3 — — — — -39 +89 -110 25.9% -1.90 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.0 -1.67
23 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84 1979 1615 118.7 — — — — -69 — -31 43.3% -0.43 1–1 0–1 — +0.96
24 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23 1980 1578 102.2 — — — — — +170 -47 47.5% -0.47 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.09
25 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20 1981 1652 129.6 — — — — — +131 — 67.7% +1.51 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +2.42
26 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60 1982 1618 104.2 — — — — — +106 — 50.0% +0.38 0–2 — — +0.53
27 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24 1983 1625 105.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 — — +0.05
28 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80 — 1800 127.0 — — — — -98 +67 -73 49.3% -0.08 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 101.3 +4.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.