H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Jo Durie H2H: 2-4

Jo Durie holds a 4–2 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jo Durie leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1985 Monticello round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main-draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jo Durie #50 6-2 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Aug 22, 1985* R32 Monticello WTA 250 Hard
Jo Durie 6-3 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Jun 16, 1983* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Mima Jausovec 3-6 7-5 6-2 Jo Durie Match data Jun 4, 1983* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jo Durie 6-4 7-5 Mima Jausovec Match data Feb 17, 1983* R32 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-1 6-4 Jo Durie Match data Oct 23, 1982* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet
Jo Durie 2-6 7-6 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data Jun 20, 1979* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,101 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,619 0 1
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,733 0 4
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,859 0 7
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,094 0 9
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,890 0 9
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,841 0 9
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,702 0 9
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Jo Durie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Jo Durie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +94 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.14
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21 1977 1602 121.5 — — — — — -35 +40 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.47
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +18 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +2.99
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1979 1714 129.5 — — — — — -76 -94 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.87
19 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1980 1734 122.7 — — — — -184 -10 -56 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.68
20 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1981 1859 136.3 — — — — -159 -77 -116 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -0.98
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1982 1841 141.1 — — — — -59 -75 -37 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -2.62
22 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1983 2095 159.8 — — — — -75 -184 -99 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.64
23 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 1984 1891 136.3 — — — — +11 -59 +84 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.18
24 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1985 1800 133.3 — — — — +15 -48 +123 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.37
25 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1986 1842 140.0 — — — — +2 -79 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -3.56
26 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1987 1741 134.1 — — — — +30 -30 +108 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.3 -2.72
27 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — -1 -16 +119 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.26
28 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 1989 1622 126.0 — — — — -8 — +201 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.38
29 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04
30 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +4 -111 +94 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02
31 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 1992 1689 130.7 — — — — -48 -50 +162 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1563 107.8 — — — — -11 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1548 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
Career — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 — 2101 141.6 — — — — -26 -67 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.