H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Jo Durie H2H: 2-4

Jo Durie holds a 4–2 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jo Durie leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1985 Monticello third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 69 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 1985* Monticello WTA 250 R32 Hard Jo Durie #50 6-2 6-3 Mima Jausovec #82 Match data
Jun 16, 1983* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Jo Durie 6-3 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data
Jun 4, 1983* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Mima Jausovec 3-6 7-5 6-2 Jo Durie Match data
Feb 17, 1983* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Jo Durie 6-4 7-5 Mima Jausovec Match data
Oct 23, 1982* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Carpet Mima Jausovec 6-1 6-4 Jo Durie Match data
Jun 20, 1979* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Jo Durie 2-6 7-6 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,088 339 246 57.9% 1 1 0 1 4 7
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,790 0 1 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,804 0 1 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 1,996 0 4 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,008 1 5 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,922 1 6 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,866 1 6 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,941 1 6 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,010 1 6 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,861 1 7 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9