H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Joanne Russell H2H: 7-2

Mima Jausovec holds a 7–2 lead over Joanne Russell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 5–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Joanne Russell won the 1982 Richmond quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
7 2
9 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joanne Russell 6-4 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Dec 11, 1982* QF Richmond WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-3 Joanne Russell Match data Sep 17, 1982* R16 Tokyo Tv Open WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 3-6 7-6 6-3 Joanne Russell Match data Sep 2, 1982* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Joanne Russell 6-7 6-3 7-5 Mima Jausovec Match data Jun 25, 1982* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-2 Joanne Russell Match data Mar 13, 1982* QF Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-4 Joanne Russell Match data Feb 21, 1981* QF Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-3 Joanne Russell Match data Mar 15, 1980* QF Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 9-8 7-9 6-4 Joanne Russell Match data Jun 30, 1978* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-3 Joanne Russell Match data Jan 22, 1976* R16 Landover WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Joanne Russell 1,936 203 199 50.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Joanne Russell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% 1,533 0 1
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,560 0 1
17 1974 18–13 58.1% 1,793 0 1
18 1975 16–19 45.7% 1,833 0 1 1973 3–2 60.0% 1,544 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% 2,004 0 4 1974 5–2 71.4% 1,579 0 1
20 1977 32–21 60.4% 2,010 1 5 1975 17–12 58.6% 1,691 0 2
21 1978 29–19 60.4% 1,947 1 6 1976 16–14 53.3% 1,817 0 2
22 1979 32–28 53.3% 1,870 1 6 1977 19–16 54.3% 1,880 0 2
23 1980 34–22 60.7% 1,945 1 6 1978 13–16 44.8% 1,859 0 2
24 1981 57–28 67.1% 2,013 1 6 1979 6–10 37.5% 1,777 0 3
25 1982 36–24 60.0% 1,857 1 7 1980 30–22 57.7% 1,874 0 3
26 1983 23–16 59.0% 1,873 1 7 1981 27–23 54.0% 1,807 0 3
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1982 20–22 47.6% 1,825 0 3
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1983 11–11 50.0% 1,799 0 3
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1984 27–17 61.4% 1,838 0 5
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1985 7–20 25.9% 1,613 0 5
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1986 2–10 16.7% 1,534 0 5
32 1987 0–2 0.0% 1,514 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Joanne Russell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 2 0 2 100.0%
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1974 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1976 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 6 12 50.0%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1977 6 4 10 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 10 17 41.2%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1980 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 9 21 57.1%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 12 10 22 54.5%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 13 12 25 52.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0%
30 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% 45 43 88 51.1% 50 48 98 51.0% 22 25 47 46.8% 68 75 143 47.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Joanne Russell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 100.0% +3.75 +0.55
16 1973 1561 114.8 +38 57.1% +1.57 1–0 +0.21
17 1974 1794 144.8 -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90
18 1975 1833 146.7 -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1973 1544 116.2 58.3% +0.92 1–1 0–1 -0.40
19 1976 2004 156.6 -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1974 1580 104.9 +12 62.5% +0.50 2–0 2–1 (67%) +1.32
20 1977 2011 161.6 -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1975 1691 132.4 -81 -39 58.0% +0.36 5–6 (45%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.38
21 1978 1947 147.6 -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1976 1817 140.3 -129 -143 -154 49.2% +0.11 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.2 -2.22
22 1979 1871 146.4 -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1977 1880 149.5 -95 -101 -215 53.8% +0.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.8 -3.20
23 1980 1945 155.9 +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 1978 1859 147.6 -125 -32 -151 46.4% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 -3.77
24 1981 2013 157.1 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1979 1777 131.2 -82 +73 -117 41.9% -0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.9 -2.29
25 1982 1858 148.5 +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1980 1874 145.9 -53 -41 -188 50.0% +0.13 16–2 (89%) 4–4 (50%) 113.8 -4.24
26 1983 1874 143.9 -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1981 1808 138.5 +27 +22 -108 51.3% -0.02 13–8 (62%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -2.37
27 1984 1748 131.7 -27 +199 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 1982 1825 141.7 +47 -82 -41 44.9% -0.29 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.5 -2.29
28 1985 1695 127.6 -21 +205 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 1983 1799 134.2 +55 -16 49.0% -0.25 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -2.15
29 1986 1673 105.7 +197 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.18 1984 1839 128.3 +82 -129 -110 57.8% +0.28 9–5 (64%) 9–3 (75%) 105.8 +2.75
30 1987 1656 107.2 +179 40.0% -1.60 0–2 -0.33 1985 1614 112.0 +49 +13 +71 26.3% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 0–6 (0%) 95.4 +0.04
31 1988 1641 110.1 +162 25.0% -2.75 -0.77 1986 1535 105.7 +62 +35 30.0% -1.47 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.07
32 1987 1515 97.5 0.0% -4.00 +0.11
Career 2091 156.0 -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 1937 143.7 -13 -35 -119 48.7% -0.06 79–52 (60%) 45–42 (52%) 108.6 -5.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.