H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Kate Brasher H2H: 1-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Brasher in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1981 Brighton round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Brasher
GBR Age 64

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-4 Kate Brasher Match data Oct 22, 1981* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Kate Brasher — — — 1,734 73 61 54.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Kate Brasher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,465 0 0
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1979 0–4 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1980 8–11 42.1% — 1,480 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1981 29–16 64.4% — 1,622 0 2
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4 1982 25–11 69.4% — 1,638 0 4
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1983 3–5 37.5% — 1,612 0 6
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,584 0 6
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6 1985 0–3 0.0% — 1,531 0 6
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6 — — — — — — —
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6 — — — — — — —
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7 — — — — — — —
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7 — — — — — — —
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7 — — — — — — —
28 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7 — — — — — — —
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 — — — — — — —
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Kate Brasher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 — — — — 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 2 4 6 33.3% 17 18 35 48.6% 5 17 22 22.7% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Kate Brasher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1481 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.46
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1466 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.21
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 1978 1493 109.5 — — — — — — +18 50.0% +0.37 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.67
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17 1979 1440 92.3 — — — — — +18 — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.64
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15 1980 1481 106.8 — — — — — -8 +24 42.2% -0.47 4–3 (57%) — — +0.59
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20 1981 1622 128.1 — — — — — — -125 63.4% +0.97 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 +0.47
19 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08 1982 1639 118.1 — — — — -125 -5 -131 64.1% +1.04 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +2.59
20 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46 1983 1612 104.4 — — — — — — -133 35.0% -1.20 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 +0.31
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09 1984 1585 95.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.43 1–0 — — +0.62
22 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01 1985 1531 92.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.31
23 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80 — 1735 116.9 — — — — -125 -4 -77 52.8% +0.29 17–13 (57%) 9–11 (45%) 102.6 +5.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.