H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Kate Latham H2H: 5-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 5–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1983 Berlin Open round of 64 4-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 4-6 6-3 6-3 Kate Latham Match data May 18, 1983* R64 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Feb 4, 1982* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 7-6 6-1 Kate Latham Match data Mar 20, 1981* R16 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 7-6 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Sep 11, 1980* R32 Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Hard
Mima Jausovec 6-4 6-4 Kate Latham Match data Sep 1, 1980* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.