H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mima Jausovec vs Kora Schediwy H2H: 2-0
Mima Jausovec holds a 2–0 lead over Kora Schediwy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1976 Hamburg third round 6-7 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1976* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 6-7 6-1 6-3 | Kora Schediwy | Match data |
| May 23, 1975* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Kora Schediwy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Kora Schediwy | — | — | — | 1,704 | 70 | 76 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mima Jausovec | Kora Schediwy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 | 1973 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 | 1974 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 | 1978 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |