H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Lucia Romanov H2H: 1-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 1–0 lead over Lucia Romanov in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1981 Kansas City round of 32 6-4 6-3.

SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-4 6-3 Lucia Romanov Match data Jan 15, 1981* R32 Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Lucia Romanov 1,796 47 78 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mima Jausovec Lucia Romanov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 2–0 100.0% 1,533 0 1 1979 3–5 37.5% 1,555 0 0
1973 2–1 66.7% 1,560 0 1 1980 9–16 36.0% 1,613 0 0
1974 18–13 58.1% 1,793 0 1 1981 10–14 41.7% 1,681 0 0
1975 16–19 45.7% 1,833 0 1 1982 13–12 52.0% 1,755 0 0
1976 33–16 67.3% 2,004 0 4 1983 6–18 25.0% 1,596 0 0
1977 32–21 60.4% 2,010 1 5 1984 6–13 31.6% 1,509 0 0
1978 29–19 60.4% 1,947 1 6
1979 32–28 53.3% 1,870 1 6
1980 34–22 60.7% 1,945 1 6
1981 57–28 67.1% 2,013 1 6
1982 36–24 60.0% 1,857 1 7
1983 23–16 59.0% 1,873 1 7
1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Mima Jausovec Lucia Romanov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 2 0 2 100.0% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1973 2 1 3 66.7% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1987 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% Career 14 22 36 38.9% 21 26 47 44.7% 6 11 17 35.3% 6 18 24 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Mima Jausovec Lucia Romanov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1533 109.9 100.0% +3.75 +0.55 1979 1555 122.8 +17 42.9% -0.50 1–0 -0.08
1973 1561 114.8 +38 57.1% +1.57 1–0 +0.21 1980 1613 120.8 +6 -59 40.7% -0.63 2–4 (33%) 2–0 -0.02
1974 1794 144.8 -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1981 1682 132.0 -38 +21 -151 41.8% -0.58 4–3 (57%) 1–0 -2.03
1975 1833 146.7 -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1982 1756 135.2 -155 +6 -112 46.3% -0.41 5–3 (63%) 0–1 -1.32
1976 2004 156.6 -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1983 1597 101.7 -78 +84 +24 29.6% -1.41 2–4 (33%) 0–2 +0.30
1977 2011 161.6 -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1984 1510 103.1 -28 +121 39.1% -0.78 2–6 (25%) 0–2 +1.91
1978 1947 147.6 -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80
1979 1871 146.4 -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84
1980 1945 155.9 +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63
1981 2013 157.1 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
1982 1858 148.5 +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
1983 1874 143.9 -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67
1984 1748 131.7 -27 +199 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31
1985 1695 127.6 -21 +205 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67
1986 1673 105.7 +197 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.18
1987 1656 107.2 +179 40.0% -1.60 0–2 -0.33
1988 1641 110.1 +162 25.0% -2.75 -0.77
Career 2091 156.0 -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 Career 1797 125.0 -47 +41 -93 39.7% -0.75 15–20 (43%) 4–5 (44%) 99.5 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.