H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mima Jausovec vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-2
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–0 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1984 Roland Garros third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1984* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 6-3 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1982* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-7 6-4 6-2 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mima Jausovec | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |
| 28 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |