H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 1-0

Mima Jausovec holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1982 Detroit quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mary Lou Piatek
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 7-5 6-2 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Feb 6, 1982* QF Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,931 153 206 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mima Jausovec Mary Lou Piatek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,546 0 0
1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1980 16–12 57.1% — 1,734 0 0
1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,869 0 1
1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4 1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,791 0 1
1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,720 0 1
1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,703 0 2
1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6 1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,677 0 2
1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6 1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,618 0 2
1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6 1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2
1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7 1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2
1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,592 0 2
1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,611 0 2
1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,629 0 2
1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,559 0 2
1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,554 0 2
1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Mima Jausovec Mary Lou Piatek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 11 24 54.2%
1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1985 7 11 18 38.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1988 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% Career 75 85 160 46.9% 17 32 49 34.7% 12 29 41 29.3% 49 60 109 45.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Mima Jausovec Mary Lou Piatek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 1978 1499 106.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12
1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21 1979 1547 118.2 — — — — +97 — — 42.1% -0.89 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.14
1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1980 1735 137.7 — — — — +8 -158 — 55.7% +0.51 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.18
1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1981 1869 146.1 — — — — +63 -192 -295 56.7% +0.48 8–10 (44%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -3.04
1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1982 1792 141.6 — — — — +56 -194 -210 47.1% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 96.7 -0.75
1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1983 1721 143.7 — — — — +53 -86 — 41.3% -0.43 4–7 (36%) 0–5 (0%) 91.3 -3.81
1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1984 1703 128.4 — — — — -13 — -69 47.7% -0.47 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.0 -0.69
1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1985 1678 113.6 — — — — -29 -65 -67 43.1% -0.61 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +2.10
1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 1986 1618 111.0 — — — — +10 — -24 38.5% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.5 +1.60
1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1987 1594 117.2 — — — — +33 — — 35.7% -0.78 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.29
1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1988 1542 116.2 — — — — +33 -43 — 30.8% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.55
1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1989 1592 121.3 — — — — +35 -116 — 31.4% -1.65 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -2.88
1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 1990 1611 125.3 — — — — +8 -85 — 43.9% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.44
1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 1991 1630 119.4 — — — — +17 — — 41.4% -0.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.69
1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1992 1560 101.4 — — — — -16 — — 23.8% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.39
1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33 1993 1555 103.2 — — — — -22 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.16
1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 Career 1932 136.4 — — — — +26 -124 -154 43.9% -0.44 46–55 (46%) 19–34 (36%) 92.3 -2.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.