H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mima Jausovec vs Petra Delhees Jauch H2H: 2-0
Mima Jausovec holds a 2–0 lead over Petra Delhees Jauch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1984 Amelia Island second round 3-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1984* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 3-6 6-2 6-0 | Petra Delhees Jauch | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1982* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 6-4 6-7 7-5 | Petra Delhees Jauch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Petra Delhees Jauch | — | — | — | 1,720 | 69 | 91 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mima Jausovec | Petra Delhees Jauch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 | 1980 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 | 1985 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |