H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 7-4

Mima Jausovec holds a 7–4 lead over Regina Marsikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 7–1 on clay, while Regina Marsikova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1981 Berlin Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
7 4
11 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Regina Marsikova 6-4 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data May 23, 1981* QF Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay
Regina Marsikova 2-6 6-1 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Oct 25, 1979* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Regina Marsikova 6-3 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Aug 31, 1979* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-4 Regina Marsikova Match data Jun 10, 1978* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-1 3-6 6-1 Regina Marsikova Match data May 20, 1978* SF Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-4 6-3 Regina Marsikova Match data Aug 28, 1977* SF Charlotte WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-1 3-6 6-3 Regina Marsikova Match data Jun 4, 1977* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 7-5 Regina Marsikova Match data Aug 21, 1976* QF Canadian Open WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-4 7-5 Regina Marsikova Match data Aug 7, 1976* SF Prerov WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 7-5 6-1 Regina Marsikova Match data May 29, 1976* SF Italian Open WTA 250 Clay
Regina Marsikova 6-3 1-6 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Feb 20, 1976* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Regina Marsikova 2,034 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Regina Marsikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% 1,533 0 1 1974 0–2 0.0% 1,499 0 0
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,560 0 1 1975 5–5 50.0% 1,581 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% 1,793 0 1 1976 17–15 53.1% 1,748 0 1
18 1975 16–19 45.7% 1,833 0 1 1977 37–17 68.5% 1,909 0 8
19 1976 33–16 67.3% 2,004 0 4 1978 56–30 65.1% 1,953 0 12
20 1977 32–21 60.4% 2,010 1 5 1979 38–24 61.3% 1,937 0 12
21 1978 29–19 60.4% 1,947 1 6 1980 33–22 60.0% 1,899 0 14
22 1979 32–28 53.3% 1,870 1 6 1981 34–16 68.0% 1,996 0 15
23 1980 34–22 60.7% 1,945 1 6
24 1981 57–28 67.1% 2,013 1 6
25 1982 36–24 60.0% 1,857 1 7
26 1983 23–16 59.0% 1,873 1 7 1985 12–16 42.9% 1,763 0 15
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1986 15–19 44.1% 1,719 0 15
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1987 14–19 42.4% 1,672 0 15
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1988 4–7 36.4% 1,605 0 15
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1989 1–6 14.3% 1,540 0 15
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Regina Marsikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 2 0 2 100.0% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1976 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
30 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Regina Marsikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 100.0% +3.75 +0.55 1974 1500 116.5 0.0% -3.50 -0.30
16 1973 1561 114.8 +38 57.1% +1.57 1–0 +0.21 1975 1582 125.6 +75 +3 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 +0.09
17 1974 1794 144.8 -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1976 1748 142.4 -178 +62 -176 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.38
18 1975 1833 146.7 -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1977 1909 143.6 -347 +113 -243 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.8 +1.24
19 1976 2004 156.6 -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1978 1953 157.8 -98 +117 -133 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.5 -6.24
20 1977 2011 161.6 -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1979 1937 147.6 -80 +154 -90 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.91
21 1978 1947 147.6 -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1980 1899 147.5 -23 +194 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.21
22 1979 1871 146.4 -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1981 1997 159.3 -116 +182 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -6.03
23 1980 1945 155.9 +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63
24 1981 2013 157.1 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
25 1982 1858 148.5 +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
26 1983 1874 143.9 -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1985 1764 131.5 +4 +295 -77 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.30
27 1984 1748 131.7 -27 +199 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 1986 1720 126.9 +1 +191 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.11
28 1985 1695 127.6 -21 +205 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 1987 1672 129.0 +36 +92 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.58
29 1986 1673 105.7 +197 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.18 1988 1606 99.5 +87 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 +0.61
30 1987 1656 107.2 +179 40.0% -1.60 0–2 -0.33 1989 1541 97.0 +71 14.3% -2.21 0–1 +0.28
31 1988 1641 110.1 +162 25.0% -2.75 -0.77
Career 2091 156.0 -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 2034 150.4 -68 +139 -140 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.