H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-1

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1988 Aix En Provence third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 69 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 21, 1988* Aix En Provence WTA 250 R32 Clay Sandra Cecchini #17 6-1 6-1 Mima Jausovec #255 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,088 339 246 57.9% 1 1 0 1 4 7
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,790 0 1 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,804 0 1 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 1,996 0 4 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,008 1 5 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,922 1 6 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,866 1 6 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,941 1 6 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,010 1 6 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,861 1 7 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11