H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mima Jausovec vs Vicki Nelson H2H: 2-1
Mima Jausovec holds a 2–1 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1984 Berlin second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1984* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 6-1 6-4 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1984* | Palm Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Vicki Nelson | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1983* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 6-2 6-1 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mima Jausovec | Vicki Nelson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 | 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |