H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Wendy White H2H: 0-3

Wendy White holds a 3–0 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wendy White leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Wendy White won the 1984 Canadian Open round of 64 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Wendy White
USA Age 66 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wendy White #40 6-4 7-5 Mima Jausovec #49 Match data Aug 22, 1984* R64 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Wendy White #38 7-6 7-6 Mima Jausovec #44 Match data Jun 27, 1984* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Wendy White 3-6 6-3 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Mar 4, 1983* R16 Palm Springs WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Wendy White — #28 24 1,857 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Wendy White
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
18 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,554 0 0
19 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4 1980 15–13 53.6% — 1,730 0 0
20 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5 1981 16–16 50.0% — 1,768 0 0
21 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6 1982 20–20 50.0% — 1,761 0 0
22 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6 1983 25–21 54.3% — 1,817 0 0
23 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6 1984 13–18 41.9% #67 1,718 0 0
24 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6 1985 8–16 33.3% — 1,608 0 0
25 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7 1986 22–19 53.7% #45 1,701 0 1
26 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7 1987 17–17 50.0% #34 1,732 0 1
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7 1988 10–16 38.5% #66 1,671 0 1
28 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7 1989 9–16 36.0% #102 1,614 0 1
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1990 3–9 25.0% #154 1,566 0 1
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 — — — — — — —
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,552 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Wendy White
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1980 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1982 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1985 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1986 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1988 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% — 61 78 139 43.9% 17 26 43 39.5% 43 43 86 50.0% 40 42 82 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Wendy White
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15 1978 1491 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
18 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20 1979 1555 130.6 — — — — +69 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.43
19 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08 1980 1731 140.7 — — — — -10 — -101 53.1% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.2 -1.14
20 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46 1981 1768 130.9 — — — — +8 -203 -118 49.3% +0.14 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 103.2 -1.21
21 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09 1982 1762 136.5 — — — — +8 — -121 47.1% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.0 -1.07
22 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01 1983 1818 144.5 — — — — +14 -121 -154 50.0% -0.02 11–5 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 106.1 -3.91
23 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84 1984 1718 135.3 — — — — -8 -48 +26 44.3% -0.23 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 97.0 -1.53
24 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23 1985 1608 111.8 — — — — +9 — +122 34.5% -1.05 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 +1.02
25 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20 1986 1702 130.3 — — — — +2 -87 +29 52.0% +0.27 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 101.2 +1.37
26 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60 1987 1733 132.0 — — — — -64 -126 +100 46.6% -0.48 5–2 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 107.1 -1.23
27 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24 1988 1672 122.4 — — — — -31 — +139 37.9% -1.00 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 -0.55
28 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55 1989 1615 115.8 — — — — -2 -48 +121 39.3% -0.82 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 100.6 +0.38
29 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21 1990 1567 104.7 — — — — +6 — +171 25.0% -1.68 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 -0.13
30 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77 1992 1552 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.04
Career — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80 — 1857 137.4 — — — — -3 -116 +17 44.9% -0.33 59–44 (57%) 42–41 (51%) 107.1 -2.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.