H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mima Jausovec vs Wendy White H2H: 0-3
Wendy White holds a 3–0 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wendy White leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Wendy White won the 1984 Montreal second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1984* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Wendy White | 6-4 7-5 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Wendy White | 7-6 7-6 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1983* | Palm Springs | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Wendy White | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Wendy White | #567 | #28 | 24 | 1,858 | 161 | 189 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mima Jausovec | Wendy White | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 | 1981 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 20–20 | 50.0% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 | 1985 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 | 1986 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #45 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 | 1987 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 | 1988 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #154 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |