H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mima Jausovec vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-3

Zina Garrison holds a 3–0 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1985 Zurich round of 32 6-1 6-1.

SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 3
3 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #9 6-1 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Oct 31, 1985* R32 Zurich WTA 250 Hard
Zina Garrison 6-4 5-7 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Jun 17, 1982* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Zina Garrison 7-5 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Jun 1, 1982* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mima Jausovec Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 2–0 100.0% 1,533 0 1
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,560 0 1 1980 2–2 50.0% 1,529 0 1
17 1974 18–13 58.1% 1,793 0 1 1981 5–5 50.0% 1,569 0 1
18 1975 16–19 45.7% 1,833 0 1 1982 23–15 60.5% 1,853 0 1
19 1976 33–16 67.3% 2,004 0 4 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,990 0 1
20 1977 32–21 60.4% 2,010 1 5 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1978 29–19 60.4% 1,947 1 6 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4
22 1979 32–28 53.3% 1,870 1 6 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5
23 1980 34–22 60.7% 1,945 1 6 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7
24 1981 57–28 67.1% 2,013 1 6 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7
25 1982 36–24 60.0% 1,857 1 7 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10
26 1983 23–16 59.0% 1,873 1 7 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11
27 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12
29 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,888 0 14
31 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mima Jausovec Zina Garrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 2 0 2 100.0%
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5%
20 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
21 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
22 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
23 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2% 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7% 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7% 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
26 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
27 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
28 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3%
29 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
30 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7%
32 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
Career 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2% 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mima Jausovec Zina Garrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1533 109.9 100.0% +3.75 +0.55
16 1973 1561 114.8 +38 57.1% +1.57 1–0 +0.21 1980 1529 117.3 +48 55.6% +0.56 0–1 +0.25
17 1974 1794 144.8 -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90 1981 1570 122.3 +74 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) +1.08
18 1975 1833 146.7 -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97 1982 1854 155.0 -185 -170 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -5.41
19 1976 2004 156.6 -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78 1983 1991 154.6 -125 -109 -50 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.31
20 1977 2011 161.6 -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51 1984 2013 157.3 +15 -96 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 +0.09
21 1978 1947 147.6 -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80 1985 2033 160.2 +49 -57 -42 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +1.14
22 1979 1871 146.4 -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84 1986 2001 159.2 +95 -126 -21 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.84
23 1980 1945 155.9 +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63 1987 1988 166.8 +36 -60 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.77
24 1981 2013 157.1 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76 1988 2043 162.0 +19 -89 +75 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.39
25 1982 1858 148.5 +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56 1989 2135 170.0 +59 -212 -20 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.28
26 1983 1874 143.9 -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67 1990 2041 161.7 +14 -144 +213 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68
27 1984 1748 131.7 -27 +199 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31 1991 1964 153.9 +30 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03
28 1985 1695 127.6 -21 +205 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67 1992 1915 157.8 +39 -53 +312 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17
29 1986 1673 105.7 +197 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.18 1993 1996 160.6 +22 -217 +199 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.22
30 1987 1656 107.2 +179 40.0% -1.60 0–2 -0.33 1994 1889 145.3 +24 -186 +259 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25
31 1988 1641 110.1 +162 25.0% -2.75 -0.77 1995 1868 147.9 +29 -240 +311 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45
32 1996 1712 111.8 +23 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.20
Career 2091 156.0 -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15 2146 164.6 +27 -112 +91 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.