H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mimi Wikstedt vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 0-1

Florenta Mihai holds a 1–0 lead over Mimi Wikstedt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florenta Mihai leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florenta Mihai won the 1979 US Open round of 128 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mimi Wikstedt
SWE 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Florenta Mihai
ROU

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florenta Mihai 6-3 7-5 Mimi Wikstedt Match data Aug 30, 1979* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mimi Wikstedt — — — 1,598 52 97 34.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Florenta Mihai — — — 1,799 89 90 49.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mimi Wikstedt Florenta Mihai
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,489 0 0 1974 3–2 60.0% — 1,515 0 0
19 1973 7–11 38.9% — 1,497 0 0 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,508 0 0
20 1974 13–18 41.9% — 1,464 0 0 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,634 0 0
21 1975 5–12 29.4% — 1,478 0 0 1977 16–13 55.2% — 1,774 0 1
22 1976 5–8 38.5% — 1,511 0 0 1978 7–20 25.9% — 1,642 0 1
23 1977 5–4 55.6% — 1,550 0 0 1979 7–9 43.8% — 1,615 0 1
24 1978 7–14 33.3% — 1,553 0 0 1980 7–9 43.8% — 1,578 0 1
25 1979 6–12 33.3% — 1,493 0 0 1981 30–13 69.8% — 1,652 0 3
26 1980 1–7 12.5% — 1,435 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,618 0 3
27 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,403 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,624 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mimi Wikstedt Florenta Mihai
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1972 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1973 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1974 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1979 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1980 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 1981 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 4 15 19 21.1% 15 36 51 29.4% 24 31 55 43.6% 5 6 11 45.5% — 3 10 13 23.1% 39 27 66 59.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 9 22 31 29.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mimi Wikstedt Florenta Mihai
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1972 1490 101.0 — — — — — -9 +59 31.6% -1.47 1–2 (33%) — — +0.34 1974 1516 105.0 — — — — — +18 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 0–1 — +1.34
19 1973 1498 110.2 — — — — +104 -68 +69 43.2% -0.16 3–5 (38%) — — +2.45 1975 1509 103.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 — +1.56
20 1974 1465 101.1 — — — — +101 -3 +108 39.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 0–2 — +3.67 1976 1634 124.5 — — — — -65 +1 -51 41.8% -0.45 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 107.6 +0.91
21 1975 1479 109.1 — — — — +91 +45 — 32.5% -1.43 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1977 1774 133.4 — — — — -215 +53 — 52.9% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 106.6 +0.88
22 1976 1511 106.5 — — — — +43 — +84 41.4% -0.96 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.1 +1.08 1978 1643 119.2 — — — — -37 +89 -110 25.9% -1.90 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.0 -1.87
23 1977 1551 102.4 — — — — — — +56 52.2% -0.26 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.68 1979 1615 118.8 — — — — -69 — -31 43.3% -0.43 1–1 0–1 — +0.94
24 1978 1553 100.6 — — — — -35 -119 +74 35.4% -1.10 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +1.48 1980 1579 102.2 — — — — — +168 -47 47.5% -0.47 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.23
25 1979 1494 101.9 — — — — — -71 +94 40.0% -0.80 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 98.2 +2.15 1981 1652 129.6 — — — — — +130 — 67.7% +1.51 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 +2.54
26 1980 1436 85.9 — — — — — -64 — 22.2% -2.61 0–2 1–0 — +0.31 1982 1618 104.2 — — — — — +106 — 50.0% +0.38 0–2 — — +0.59
27 1981 1404 96.3 — — — — — — — 9.1% -2.18 0–1 0–2 — +0.16 1983 1625 105.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 — — +0.05
Career — 1599 103.3 — — — — +64 -35 +80 37.3% -0.95 20–27 (43%) 10–9 (53%) 100.6 +8.41 — 1800 126.9 — — — — -97 +66 -73 49.3% -0.08 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 101.3 +4.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.