H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mimi Wikstedt vs Naoko Sato H2H: 2-0
Mimi Wikstedt holds a 2–0 lead over Naoko Sato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mimi Wikstedt leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mimi Wikstedt won the 1977 Beckenham fourth round 6-0 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1977* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Mimi Wikstedt | 6-0 9-7 | Naoko Sato | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1974* | Sebring | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Mimi Wikstedt | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | Naoko Sato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mimi Wikstedt | — | — | — | 1,600 | 52 | 97 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Naoko Sato | — | — | — | 1,637 | 58 | 91 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mimi Wikstedt | Naoko Sato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |