H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mimi Wikstedt vs Penny Moor H2H: 1-1
Mimi Wikstedt and Penny Moor are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mimi Wikstedt leads 1–0 on clay, while Penny Moor leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Penny Moor won the 1972 Surbiton second round 5-7 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1972* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Penny Moor | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Mimi Wikstedt | Match data |
| May 25, 1972* | Chingford | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mimi Wikstedt | 5-4 (ret.) | Penny Moor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mimi Wikstedt | — | — | — | 1,600 | 52 | 97 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Penny Moor | — | — | — | 1,552 | 53 | 111 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mimi Wikstedt | Penny Moor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 7–21 | 25.0% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |