H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 1-2

Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 2–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1998 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 7-6 6-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 1998 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Miriam Oremans #54 7-6 6-7 6-2 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data
Mar 20, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R128 Hard Alexia Dechaume Balleret 3-6 6-3 6-2 Miriam Oremans #53 Match data
Aug 31, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Alexia Dechaume Balleret 6-4 6-3 Miriam Oremans #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,739 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Alexia Dechaume Balleret
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,538 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,494 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,602 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,646 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,732 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,709 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,577 0 0
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,621 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,593 0 0
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,572 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0