H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Anne-Gaelle Sidot H2H: 3-0

Miriam Oremans holds a 3–0 lead over Anne-Gaelle Sidot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2000 Bratislava quarterfinal 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Anne-Gaelle Sidot
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #73 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(6) Anne-Gaelle Sidot #30 Match data Oct 28, 2000* QF Bratislava Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Miriam Oremans #49 3-6 6-3 7-5 Anne-Gaelle Sidot #50 Match data Mar 19, 1999* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Miriam Oremans #58 7-6 6-7 6-3 Anne-Gaelle Sidot #36 Match data Feb 26, 1998* R32 Linz Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anne-Gaelle Sidot #252 #24 1,128 1,750 90 125 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Anne-Gaelle Sidot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1996 6–6 50.0% #50 1,597 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1997 22–24 47.8% #33 1,692 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1998 10–21 32.3% #54 1,631 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1999 17–26 39.5% #34 1,718 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 2000 25–27 48.1% #35 1,701 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 2001 9–19 32.1% #120 1,545 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #246 1,545 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Anne-Gaelle Sidot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 6 7 13 46.2% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 6 9 15 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 10 13 23 43.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 3 8 11 27.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2002 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 37 49 86 43.0% 17 34 51 33.3% 10 14 24 41.7% 26 28 54 48.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Anne-Gaelle Sidot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1597 133.0 — — — — +35 — — 51.7% +0.31 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.18
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1997 1693 138.3 — — — — +13 -135 -95 47.1% -0.05 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.7 +1.11
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1998 1631 132.5 — — — — +58 -136 — 40.0% -0.72 4–9 (31%) 5–5 (50%) 96.0 -0.06
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1999 1719 146.5 — — — — +41 -201 -192 41.1% -0.56 11–10 (52%) 1–6 (14%) 99.6 -1.64
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 2000 1702 140.3 — — — — +4 -101 -100 48.1% -0.22 13–12 (52%) 7–11 (39%) 101.9 +0.58
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 2001 1545 124.1 — — — — +82 -35 +65 37.3% -0.66 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 +0.66
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 2002 1546 106.7 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–1 — +0.01
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1750 142.8 — — — — +33 -129 -77 44.0% -0.36 41–49 (46%) 24–34 (41%) 97.7 +0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.