H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Miriam Oremans vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 2-0
Miriam Oremans holds a 2–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1998 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Miriam Oremans | 6-2 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Mar 19, 1995* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Miriam Oremans | 6-1 6-1 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Miriam Oremans | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |