H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-4

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 4–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1997 Hope Island fourth round 7-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 3, 1997* Hope Island WTA 250 R16 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #12 7-6 6-0 Miriam Oremans #46 Match data
May 24, 1996* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #9 6-4 7-5 Miriam Oremans #42 Match data
Sep 29, 1994* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #24 7-6 6-4 Miriam Oremans #64 Match data
May 27, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #28 6-4 6-3 Miriam Oremans #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7