H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Dominique Monami H2H: 3-1

Miriam Oremans holds a 3–1 lead over Dominique Monami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on carpet, while Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1998 Libéma Open round of 32 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Dominique Monami
BEL Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #54 6-3 7-6 Dominique Monami #14 Match data Jun 18, 1998* R32 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Dominique Monami #59 6-3 6-3 Miriam Oremans #41 Match data May 19, 1996* QF Cardiff Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Miriam Oremans #46 6-2 6-2 Dominique Monami #53 Match data Feb 22, 1996* R32 Essen Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Miriam Oremans #138 6-1 6-1 Dominique Monami #90 Match data Jan 6, 1993* R64 Brisbane International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dominique Monami #24 #9 2,196 1,974 208 158 56.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Dominique Monami
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1991 4–5 44.4% #129 1,528 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1992 9–14 39.1% #99 1,550 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1993 15–14 51.7% #59 1,672 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1994 7–16 30.4% #134 1,601 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1995 12–9 57.1% #43 1,680 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1996 14–14 50.0% #48 1,698 0 1
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1997 39–17 69.6% #18 1,875 0 3
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1998 45–24 65.2% #12 1,918 0 4
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1999 37–25 59.7% #14 1,840 0 4
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 2000 26–20 56.5% #24 1,842 0 4
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Dominique Monami
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1991 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 5 7 12 41.7% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1997 21 7 28 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1998 21 10 31 67.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 17 11 28 60.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2000 16 13 29 55.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 100 74 174 57.5% 36 35 71 50.7% 25 18 43 58.1% 47 31 78 60.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Dominique Monami
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1991 1529 107.3 — — — — +48 — — 50.0% -0.19 — — — +0.79
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1992 1551 121.2 — — — — +78 -68 — 39.6% -0.74 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +1.30
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1993 1673 124.4 — — — — +19 -121 — 51.6% -0.16 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.4 +0.78
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1994 1601 118.4 — — — — +38 -104 -2 34.0% -1.21 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 -0.21
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1995 1681 130.2 — — — — +6 — — 59.5% +0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.06
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1996 1699 137.0 — — — — -80 -64 -8 52.5% +0.41 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 +0.12
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1997 1876 147.0 — — — — -17 -173 -163 66.9% +1.26 8–7 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.5 +2.75
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1998 1918 156.3 — — — — +11 -179 -122 62.9% +0.87 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +1.39
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1999 1840 149.4 — — — — +15 -122 -45 58.8% +0.77 8–5 (62%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 +2.82
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 2000 1842 150.9 — — — — +7 -105 +50 58.8% +0.69 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 102.9 -2.21
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1974 148.4 — — — — +10 -125 -56 56.7% +0.49 46–41 (53%) 34–30 (53%) 105.7 +2.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.