H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Els Callens H2H: 2-0

Miriam Oremans holds a 2–0 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1994 Birmingham round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #40 6-4 6-2 Els Callens #155 Match data Jun 9, 1994* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Miriam Oremans #176 6-2 6-2 Els Callens #155 Match data Jun 10, 1992* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Els Callens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Els Callens
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Els Callens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.