H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 0-1

Gigi Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1997 Wimbledon first round 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 1997* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Gigi Fernandez #167 7-6 6-3 Miriam Oremans #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,912 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Gigi Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,723 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,729 0 1
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,684 0 1
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,810 0 1
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,765 0 1
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,809 0 2
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,738 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,707 0 2