H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Miriam Oremans vs Gloria Pizzichini H2H: 1-0
Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Gloria Pizzichini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1993 Wimbledon third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 50
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Miriam Oremans | 6-1 6-4 | Gloria Pizzichini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gloria Pizzichini | #1,139 | #45 | 500 | 1,670 | 28 | 45 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miriam Oremans | Gloria Pizzichini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #200 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #90 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |