H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Helena Sukova H2H: 1-2

Helena Sukova holds a 2–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1996 Rosmalen fourth round 3-6 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 1996* Rosmalen WTA 250 R16 Grass Helena Sukova #31 3-6 6-0 6-2 Miriam Oremans #38 Match data
Jun 19, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Miriam Oremans #42 6-3 1-6 7-5 Helena Sukova #16 Match data
Aug 17, 1992 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Helena Sukova #15 6-0 7-5 Miriam Oremans #158 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,217 580 297 66.1% 0 1 0 3 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Helena Sukova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,583 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,757 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,907 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1986 69–21 76.7% #6 2,151 0 3
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1988 49–19 72.1% #8 2,120 0 5
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,043 0 6
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,025 0 6
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1992 38–15 71.7% #12 1,976 0 9
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,925 0 9
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,889 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1996 17–15 53.1% #35 1,792 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,661 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,637 0 9