H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Helena Sukova H2H: 1-2

Helena Sukova holds a 2–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1996 Rosmalen round of 16 3-6 6-0 6-2.

NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 2
3 main-draw meetings
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helena Sukova #31 3-6 6-0 6-2 Miriam Oremans #38 Match data Jun 21, 1996* R16 Rosmalen Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Miriam Oremans #42 6-3 1-6 7-5 Helena Sukova #16 Match data Jun 19, 1993* QF Eastbourne Open Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Helena Sukova #15 6-0 7-5 Miriam Oremans #158 Match data Aug 21, 1992* R16 Canadian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,218 581 300 65.9% 0 0 0 3 6 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Helena Sukova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 6–4 60.0% 1,584 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1982 23–23 50.0% 1,756 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1983 33–20 62.3% 1,907 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1986 69–21 76.7% #5 2,151 0 3
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1988 49–20 71.0% #8 2,098 0 5
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,036 0 6
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,024 0 6
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1992 39–16 70.9% #12 1,965 0 9
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,922 0 9
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,887 0 9
30 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9
31 1996 17–16 51.5% #35 1,776 0 9
32 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,655 0 9
33 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,632 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Helena Sukova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1981 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 9 16 43.8%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 12 5 17 70.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 23 5 28 82.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 27 10 37 73.0%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 20 6 26 76.9%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 21 9 30 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 11 5 16 68.8%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 26 6 32 81.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 6 18 66.7%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 16 6 22 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 20 7 27 74.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1993 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
30 1995 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
31 1996 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 1997 2 11 13 15.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% 213 105 318 67.0% 75 53 128 58.6% 125 49 174 71.8% 164 90 254 64.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Helena Sukova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1981 1584 127.8 +54 59.1% +0.91 1–1 0–3 (0%) -0.28
17 1990 1520 110.3 40.0% -0.60 1–0 -0.11 1982 1756 137.3 -64 -77 -97 48.2% -0.15 11–7 (61%) 4–7 (36%) 105.5 -2.58
18 1991 1472 101.8 +51 +51 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) +0.66 1983 1907 149.3 -85 -97 -127 59.7% +0.67 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) 102.3 -2.48
19 1992 1532 111.4 +48 -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 +0.45 1984 2042 154.9 -99 -323 +10 60.7% +0.75 20–6 (77%) 9–10 (47%) 108.0 -2.37
20 1993 1747 146.5 -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65 1985 2029 162.4 -21 -243 +104 68.7% +1.34 9–7 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 101.9 -3.44
21 1994 1733 131.3 -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41 1986 2152 173.6 +12 -258 +29 73.5% +1.77 11–9 (55%) 7–9 (44%) 97.5 -7.60
22 1995 1769 143.9 -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91 1987 2130 164.9 +25 -243 +121 69.5% +1.40 17–7 (71%) 11–4 (73%) 105.2 -4.98
23 1996 1714 134.9 -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41 1988 2099 164.2 +36 -123 +89 67.1% +1.03 10–4 (71%) 14–3 (82%) 109.5 -5.27
24 1997 1774 137.0 -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65 1989 2037 158.2 +97 -141 +86 67.5% +1.04 9–3 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 106.3 -1.47
25 1998 1728 120.1 -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25 1990 2025 160.0 +46 -104 +169 64.7% +0.88 13–4 (76%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 -0.53
26 1999 1628 117.1 -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 -1.78 1991 1958 153.8 +56 -26 +161 63.2% +1.02 9–6 (60%) 5–7 (42%) 95.3 +0.66
27 2000 1711 126.6 -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23 1992 1966 153.3 +48 -64 +185 69.2% +1.42 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 +2.03
28 2001 1690 122.8 -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04 1993 1922 151.2 +11 +198 60.2% +0.82 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 94.8 +0.04
29 2002 1613 100.3 -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42 1994 1887 144.4 +13 -45 +168 56.1% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 97.3 +1.22
30 1995 1820 144.1 +24 +33 +207 53.9% +0.05 7–5 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 105.6 -0.11
31 1996 1776 135.6 +9 -3 +295 50.6% +0.28 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 97.0 +0.50
32 1997 1655 126.9 -12 +65 +386 32.3% -1.05 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 92.0 -0.96
33 1998 1632 97.8 33.3% -1.34 0–2 -0.23
Career 1808 135.6 -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 2218 162.3 +10 -125 +96 62.6% +0.89 156–93 (63%) 105–89 (54%) 103.0 -3.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.