H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Miriam Oremans vs Irina Spirlea H2H: 1-3
Irina Spirlea holds a 3–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Irina Spirlea leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2000 Hanover third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2000* | Hanover | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Miriam Oremans | 6-3 6-3 | Irina Spirlea | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1998* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Irina Spirlea | 6-3 6-1 | Miriam Oremans | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1998* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Irina Spirlea | 7-6 6-2 | Miriam Oremans | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Irina Spirlea | 7-6 6-3 | Miriam Oremans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Irina Spirlea | #165 | #7 | 2,577 | 2,021 | 211 | 149 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miriam Oremans | Irina Spirlea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #61 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #21 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,993 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |