H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Jana Novotna H2H: 1-4

Jana Novotna holds a 4–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jana Novotna leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1995 Brighton fourth round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Jana Novotna
CZE Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 1995* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Miriam Oremans #48 6-4 6-0 Jana Novotna #7 Match data
Oct 6, 1995* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Jana Novotna #6 6-7 6-3 7-5 Miriam Oremans #38 Match data
Jun 22, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jana Novotna #5 6-4 4-6 6-4 Miriam Oremans #64 Match data
Sep 30, 1993* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Jana Novotna #8 6-7 6-1 6-1 Miriam Oremans #28 Match data
Jun 30, 1993* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Jana Novotna #9 7-5 4-6 6-4 Miriam Oremans #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jana Novotna #18 #2 5,063 2,224 504 198 71.8% 1 4 1 5 13 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Jana Novotna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1986 0–4 0.0% #171 1,466 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1987 21–17 55.3% #47 1,752 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1988 23–18 56.1% #35 1,757 0 1
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1989 45–17 72.6% #11 1,962 0 2
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1990 40–16 71.4% #13 2,016 0 3
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1991 45–15 75.0% #7 2,072 0 5
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1992 36–17 67.9% #10 2,089 0 5
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1993 46–15 75.4% #6 2,103 0 7
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1994 43–11 79.6% #4 2,141 0 10
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1995 30–12 71.4% #11 2,031 0 11
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1996 47–12 79.7% #5 2,209 0 15
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1997 52–15 77.6% #2 2,173 0 19
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 1998 50–14 78.1% #3 2,129 1 23
30 — — — — — — — 1999 26–15 63.4% #18 1,924 1 24