H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 2-3

Judith Wiesner holds a 3–2 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Judith Wiesner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 1996 Paris fourth round 6-7 7-6 7-6.

NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 1996* Paris WTA 500 R16 Clay Miriam Oremans #53 6-7 7-6 7-6 Judith Wiesner #26 Match data
Sep 29, 1995* Leipzig WTA 250 R16 Carpet Judith Wiesner #29 6-4 6-3 Miriam Oremans #39 Match data
Feb 18, 1995* Paris WTA 500 R16 Hard Judith Wiesner #23 6-4 7-5 Miriam Oremans #40 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Judith Wiesner #32 2-6 7-5 6-1 Miriam Oremans #75 Match data
Oct 8, 1993* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Miriam Oremans #29 6-2 6-4 Judith Wiesner #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,979 302 177 63.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,696 0 0
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,751 0 1
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,736 0 2
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1992 29–17 63.0% #25 1,916 0 3
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,906 0 3
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,893 0 4
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,914 0 5
30 1996 35–22 61.4% #15 1,925 0 5
31 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,829 0 5