H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 2-4

Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 4–2 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 3–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2000 US Open first round 6-3 6-4.

NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Miriam Oremans #93 6-3 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #17 Match data
Jun 15, 2000* Birmingham WTA 500 R32 Grass Julie Halard-Decugis #17 6-3 6-2 Miriam Oremans #87 Match data
Jun 11, 1999* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Julie Halard-Decugis #18 6-2 6-4 Miriam Oremans #50 Match data
Jun 15, 1998 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 F Grass Julie Halard-Decugis #57 6-3 6-4 Miriam Oremans #54 Match data
Aug 19, 1993* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Julie Halard-Decugis #42 7-6 7-6 Miriam Oremans #27 Match data
May 12, 1993* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Miriam Oremans #46 6-2 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,003 337 219 60.6% 0 0 0 3 9 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,613 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,625 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,708 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,821 0 1
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1992 22–13 62.9% #27 1,837 0 2
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,821 0 2
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,890 0 3
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,917 0 8
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,920 0 10
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 2000 29–23 55.8% #15 1,829 0 12