H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 2-4

Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 4–2 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 3–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2000 US Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 55 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #93 6-3 6-4 Julie Halard-Decugis #17 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #17 6-3 6-2 Miriam Oremans #87 Match data Jun 15, 2000* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Julie Halard-Decugis #18 6-2 6-4 Miriam Oremans #50 Match data Jun 11, 1999* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Julie Halard-Decugis #57 6-3 6-4 Miriam Oremans #54 Match data Jun 21, 1998* F Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Julie Halard-Decugis #42 7-6 7-6 Miriam Oremans #27 Match data Aug 19, 1993* R32 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Miriam Oremans #46 6-2 6-2 Julie Halard-Decugis #27 Match data May 12, 1993* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miriam Oremans Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
Career — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8% — 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miriam Oremans Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1643 124.0 — — — — -39 +21 — 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.12
17 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11 1988 1612 123.0 — — — — -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.31
18 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66 1989 1625 118.1 — — — — -29 -13 — 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.36
19 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45 1990 1708 138.4 — — — — -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) — -1.86
20 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.65 1991 1821 141.7 — — — — -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.15
21 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.41 1992 1819 144.0 — — — — -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.82
22 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.91 1993 1819 145.9 — — — — +15 +29 — 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) — +1.92
23 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.41 1994 1890 153.5 — — — — -51 +106 — 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.05
24 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.65 1995 1771 131.9 — — — — -28 +220 — 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.60
25 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.25 1996 1856 152.1 — — — — -18 +132 — 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.28
26 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78 1997 1843 108.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
27 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.23 1998 1917 157.6 — — — — -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) — -3.44
28 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.04 1999 1930 160.9 — — — — -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.13
29 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.42 2000 1837 145.6 — — — — +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.49
Career — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73 — 2024 152.3 — — — — -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.