H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Miriam Oremans vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 1-1

Miriam Oremans and Katerina Maleeva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on carpet, while Katerina Maleeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1996 Zurich third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Katerina Maleeva
BUL Age 57 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 1996* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Katerina Maleeva #224 6-3 7-5 Miriam Oremans #37 Match data
Oct 20, 1995* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Miriam Oremans #48 7-5 6-1 Katerina Maleeva #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Katerina Maleeva #456 #6 116 2,070 324 185 63.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miriam Oremans Katerina Maleeva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% #93 1,528 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1985 30–20 60.0% #28 1,813 0 2
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0 1986 24–20 54.5% #29 1,838 0 2
18 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0 1987 35–15 70.0% #13 1,948 0 4
19 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0 1988 35–16 68.6% #11 1,992 0 5
20 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0 1989 32–11 74.4% #15 1,940 0 8
21 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0 1990 47–16 74.6% #6 2,039 0 9
22 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0 1991 35–16 68.6% #11 1,967 0 10
23 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0 1992 30–18 62.5% #16 1,906 0 10
24 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0 1993 28–17 62.2% #22 1,898 0 10
25 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0 1994 20–16 55.6% #36 1,866 0 11
26 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0 1995 1–11 8.3% #302 1,679 0 11
27 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0 1996 5–7 41.7% #231 1,686 0 11
28 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —